ATI Radeon Xpress 200M vs GeForce FX 5500
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Rankine (2003−2005) | R300 (2005−2008) |
| GPU code name | NV34 B1 | RC410 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2004 (20 years ago) | 18 February 2005 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $36.99 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 6 |
| Core clock speed | 270 MHz | 2 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 350 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 45 million | 107 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 130 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 1.080 | 0.67 |
| ROPs | 4 | 2 |
| TMUs | 4 | 2 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 8x | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 152 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 0 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 332 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 5.312 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0 (9_0) |
| OpenGL | 1.5 (2.1) | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 March 2004 | 18 February 2005 |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 130 nm |
ATI Xpress 200M has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5500 and Radeon Xpress 200M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce FX 5500 is a desktop card while Radeon Xpress 200M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
