Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs GeForce FX 5500
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 1174 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Rankine (2003−2005) | TeraScale (2005−2013) |
| GPU code name | NV34 B1 | RV630 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 17 March 2004 (20 years ago) | 28 June 2007 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $36.99 | no data |
| Current price | $135 (3.6x MSRP) | $100 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 120 |
| Core clock speed | 270 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 45 million | 390 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 35 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.080 | 4.800 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 144 gflops |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 8x | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 152 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | DDR | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 332 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 5.312 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0a | 10.0 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.5 (2.1) | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Radeon HD 2600 PRO outperforms GeForce FX 5500 by 2538% in Passmark.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Recency | 17 March 2004 | 28 June 2007 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 65 nm |
We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5500 and Radeon HD 2600 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
