GRID K260Q vs GeForce FX 5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce FX 5500 with GRID K260Q, including specs and performance data.

FX 5500
2004, $37
64 MB DDR
0.02

K260Q outperforms FX 5500 by a whopping 35150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1555589
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.40
Power efficiencyno data2.41
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameNV34 B1GK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 March 2004 (21 years ago)28 June 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$36.99 $937

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed270 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors45 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate1.08095.36
Floating-point processing powerno data2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs4128
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Length152 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 5500 0.02
GRID K260Q 7.05
+35150%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 5500 8
Samples: 178
GRID K260Q 2949
+36763%
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.02 7.05
Recency 17 March 2004 28 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

GRID K260Q has a 35150% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GRID K260Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5500 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5500 is a desktop graphics card while GRID K260Q is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500
GeForce FX 5500
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
GRID K260Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 161 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K260Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5500 or GRID K260Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.