T400 4 GB vs GeForce FX 5200

Place in the ranking	1492	458
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	22.46
Architecture	Celsius (1999−2005)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	NV18 C1	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	6 March 2003 (21 year ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$69.99	no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	384
Core clock speed	250 MHz	420 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	29 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	1.000	34.20
Floating-point processing power	no data	1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	16
TMUs	4	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 8x	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	200 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	6.4 GB/s	80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

3x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.0	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.6
OpenGL	1.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 5200 0.02

T400 4 GB 9.82
+49000%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 5200 7

T400 4 GB 3782
+53929%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.02	9.82
Recency	6 March 2003	6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	150 nm	12 nm

T400 4 GB has a 49000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

The T400 4 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5200 is a desktop card while T400 4 GB is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.