GeForce2 Go vs GeForce FX 5200
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce FX 5200 with GeForce2 Go, including specs and performance data.
FX 5200 outperforms by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1566 | 1582 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.39 |
| Architecture | Celsius (1999−2005) | Celsius (1999−2005) |
| GPU code name | NV18 C1 | NV11 B2 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 6 March 2003 (23 years ago) | 11 November 2000 (25 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $69.99 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Core clock speed | 250 MHz | 143 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 29 million | 20 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 2 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.000 | 0.57 |
| ROPs | 2 | 2 |
| TMUs | 4 | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 8x | AGP 4x |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 200 MHz | 166 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | 5.312 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Recency | 6 March 2003 | 11 November 2000 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 180 nm |
FX 5200 has a 100% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce FX 5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce2 Go in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce FX 5200 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce2 Go is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
