Radeon HD 8670M vs GeForce 9800M GTX
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9800M GTX and Radeon HD 8670M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
HD 8670M outperforms 9800M GTX by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1069 | 1024 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.06 | no data |
Power efficiency | 1.09 | no data |
Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) |
GPU code name | G92 | Sun |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 July 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 March 2013 (11 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $328.50 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 112 | 320 |
CUDA cores per GPU | 112 | no data |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 975 MHz |
Number of transistors | 754 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 28.00 | 19.50 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.28 TFLOPS | 0.624 TFLOPS |
Gigaflops | 420 | no data |
ROPs | 16 | 8 |
TMUs | 56 | 20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 10−12
−20%
| 12
+20%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | 32.85 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Elden Ring | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Dota 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Fortnite | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−15.4%
|
14−16
+15.4%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 24−27
−11.5%
|
27−30
+11.5%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Dota 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−15.4%
|
14−16
+15.4%
|
1440p
High Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
World of Tanks | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Valorant | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Dota 2 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Valorant | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Elden Ring | 0−1 | 0−1 |
This is how 9800M GTX and HD 8670M compete in popular games:
- HD 8670M is 20% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 8670M is 50% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD 8670M is ahead in 19 tests (46%)
- there's a draw in 22 tests (54%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.18 | 1.35 |
Recency | 15 July 2008 | 1 March 2013 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
HD 8670M has a 14.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon HD 8670M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GTX in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.