RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server vs GeForce 9800M GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GTX with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, including specs and performance data.

9800M GTX
2008, $329
1 GB GDDR3, 75 Watt
1.09

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server outperforms 9800M by a whopping 9074% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11291
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Power efficiency1.1212.81
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameG92GB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 July 2008 (17 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$328.50 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11224064
CUDA cores per GPU112no data
Core clock speed500 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2617 MHz
Number of transistors754 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate28.001,968.0
Floating-point processing power0.28 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
Gigaflops420no data
ROPs16192
TMUs56752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188
L1 Cacheno data23.5 MB
L2 Cache64 KB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB96 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA+12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9800M GTX 1.09
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server 100.00
+9074%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9800M GTX 454
Samples: 47
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server 42222
+9200%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−9067%
550−600
+9067%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Fortnite 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−8471%
600−650
+8471%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−9067%
550−600
+9067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−8789%
800−850
+8789%
Valorant 30−35
−8963%
2900−2950
+8963%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−8974%
2450−2500
+8974%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Dota 2 14−16
−8900%
1350−1400
+8900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Fortnite 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−8471%
600−650
+8471%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−9067%
550−600
+9067%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−8789%
800−850
+8789%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−9067%
550−600
+9067%
Valorant 30−35
−8963%
2900−2950
+8963%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Dota 2 14−16
−8900%
1350−1400
+8900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−8471%
600−650
+8471%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−9067%
550−600
+9067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−8789%
800−850
+8789%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−9067%
550−600
+9067%
Valorant 30−35
−8963%
2900−2950
+8963%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−8650%
350−400
+8650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−8471%
600−650
+8471%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−8991%
1000−1050
+8991%
Valorant 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−8829%
1250−1300
+8829%
Valorant 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.09 100.00
Recency 15 July 2008 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 600 Watt

9800M GTX has 700% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, on the other hand, has a 9074.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTX is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
GeForce 9800M GTX
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 83 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GTX or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.