ATI Radeon E4690 vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GTX SLI with Radeon E4690, including specs and performance data.


9800M GTX SLI
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
2.86
+195%

9800M SLI outperforms E4690 by a whopping 195% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8311166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.472.49
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTXRV730
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2008 (17 years ago)1 June 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores224320
Core clock speed500 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors3016 Million514 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data19.20
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataMXM-II
Widthno dataMXM Module
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1010.1
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.0
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Fortnite 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Valorant 45−50
+229%
14−16
−229%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+206%
18−20
−206%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Fortnite 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Valorant 45−50
+229%
14−16
−229%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Valorant 45−50
+229%
14−16
−229%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Valorant 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Valorant 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.86 0.97
Recency 15 July 2008 1 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 30 Watt

9800M GTX SLI has a 195% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI E4690, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, a 18% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E4690 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon E4690 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 14 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E4690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GTX SLI or Radeon E4690, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.