RTX A4500 vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GTX SLI with RTX A4500, including specs and performance data.

9800M GTX SLI
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
3.07

RTX A4500 outperforms 9800M GTX SLI by a whopping 1734% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking76546
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTXGA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 July 2008 (16 years ago)23 November 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2247168
Core clock speed500 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors3016 Million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rateno data369.6
Floating-point processing powerno data23.65 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB20 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data640.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1665%
300−310
+1665%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1639%
400−450
+1639%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1669%
230−240
+1669%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1695%
700−750
+1695%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1665%
300−310
+1665%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1639%
400−450
+1639%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1669%
230−240
+1669%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1686%
250−260
+1686%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1695%
700−750
+1695%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1665%
300−310
+1665%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1639%
400−450
+1639%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1669%
230−240
+1669%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1686%
250−260
+1686%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1695%
700−750
+1695%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−1479%
300−310
+1479%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.07 56.29
Recency 15 July 2008 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 200 Watt

9800M GTX SLI has 33.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has a 1733.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is a notebook card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 190 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.