NVS 300 vs GeForce 9800M GTS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GTS with NVS 300, including specs and performance data.

9800M GTS
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 75 Watt
0.85
+193%

9800M GTS outperforms NVS 300 by a whopping 193% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11891388
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiency0.871.24
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG94GT218
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 July 2008 (17 years ago)8 January 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$109

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6416
Core clock speed600 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors505 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate19.204.160
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
Gigaflops240no data
ROPs164
TMUs328
L2 Cache64 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz790 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s12.64 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9800M GTS 0.85
+193%
NVS 300 0.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9800M GTS 356
+194%
Samples: 122
NVS 300 121
Samples: 352

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Valorant 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Escape from Tarkov 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Valorant 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Escape from Tarkov 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Valorant 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Valorant 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 0.29
Recency 29 July 2008 8 January 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 18 Watt

9800M GTS has a 193.1% higher aggregate performance score.

NVS 300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 9800M GTS is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 300 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTS is a notebook graphics card while NVS 300 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
GeForce 9800M GTS
NVIDIA NVS 300
NVS 300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 42 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 50 votes

Rate NVS 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GTS or NVS 300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.