Radeon RX 640 vs GeForce 9800M GTS SLI

Place in performance ranking	846	590
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.31	12.58
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code name	NB9E-GT	Polaris 12
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 July 2008 (15 years ago)	12 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$149	$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 640 has 3958% better value for money than 9800M GTS SLI.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	640
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1218 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1218 MHz
Number of transistors	1508 Million	2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	38.98

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 9800M GTS SLI and Radeon RX 640 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9800M GTS SLI 1.99

RX 640 5.05
+154%

Radeon RX 640 outperforms GeForce 9800M GTS SLI by 154% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

9800M GTS SLI 5663

RX 640 14141
+150%

Radeon RX 640 outperforms GeForce 9800M GTS SLI by 150% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

10−12

−170%

27
+170%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−100%

8−9
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −900%	20 +900%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −1400%	30 +1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2000%	21 +2000%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −1600%	17 +1600%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Hitman 3	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −175%	22 +175%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −1050%	23 +1050%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Hitman 3	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −300%	20 +300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −120%	11 +120%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Hitman 3	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
Metro Exodus	0−1	3−4
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Hitman 3	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	2−3
Far Cry 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%

This is how 9800M GTS SLI and RX 640 compete in popular games:

RX 640 is 170% faster than 9800M GTS SLI in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 640 is 2000% faster than the 9800M GTS SLI.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 640 is ahead in 46 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.99	5.05
Recency	15 July 2008	12 August 2019
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	50 Watt