Radeon 680M vs GeForce 9800M GTS SLI

Place in the ranking	894	333
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.90	22.23
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	NB9E-GT	Rembrandt+
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	15 July 2008 (16 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	768
Core clock speed	600 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2200 MHz
Number of transistors	1508 Million	13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	105.6
Floating-point processing power	no data	3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	System Shared
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9800M GTS SLI 1.95

Radeon 680M 15.98
+719%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9800M GTS SLI 5663

Radeon 680M 34600
+511%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	4−5 −825%	37 +825%
1440p	2−3 −800%	18 +800%
4K	1−2 −1000%	11 +1000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−875%

39
+875%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −457%	35−40 +457%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −5600%	55−60 +5600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −600%	35−40 +600%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −625%	29 +625%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −840%	45−50 +840%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1275%	110−120 +1275%
Hitman 3	7−8 −357%	32 +357%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −378%	85−90 +378%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1075%	45−50 +1075%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −470%	55−60 +470%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −143%	85−90 +143%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −457%	35−40 +457%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −5600%	55−60 +5600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −600%	35−40 +600%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −425%	21 +425%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −840%	45−50 +840%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1275%	110−120 +1275%
Hitman 3	7−8 −329%	30 +329%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −378%	85−90 +378%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1075%	45−50 +1075%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −370%	47 +370%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −233%	40−45 +233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −143%	85−90 +143%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −457%	35−40 +457%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −600%	35−40 +600%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −325%	17 +325%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1275%	110−120 +1275%
Hitman 3	7−8 −286%	27 +286%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −139%	43 +139%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −300%	40 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −100%	24 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +94.4%	18 −94.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−1075%

45−50
+1075%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −1000%	30−35 +1000%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1800%	18−20 +1800%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1000%	11 +1000%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −900%	20−22 +900%
Hitman 3	7−8 −186%	20−22 +186%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1600%	17 +1600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −855%	100−110 +855%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−480%

27−30
+480%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−1200%

12−14
+1200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	9−10
Far Cry 5	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	7−8

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−400%

14−16
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 +0%	38 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	31 +0%	31 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27 +0%	27 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 +0%	13 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	4 +0%	4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14 +0%	14 +0%

This is how 9800M GTS SLI and Radeon 680M compete in popular games:

Radeon 680M is 825% faster in 1080p
Radeon 680M is 800% faster in 1440p
Radeon 680M is 1000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 9800M GTS SLI is 94% faster.
in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 680M is 5600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

9800M GTS SLI is ahead in 1 test (1%)
Radeon 680M is ahead in 52 tests (74%)
there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.95	15.98
Recency	15 July 2008	3 January 2023
Chip lithography	55 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	50 Watt

Radeon 680M has a 719.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 816.7% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 680M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is a notebook card while Radeon 680M is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.