GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs 9800M GTS SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GTS SLI with GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

9800M GTS SLI
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 150 Watt
1.96

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms 9800M GTS SLI by a whopping 3888% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9059
Place by popularitynot in top-10013
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data66.24
Power efficiency0.9024.43
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTAD104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2008 (16 years ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1287168
Core clock speed600 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rateno data554.4
Floating-point processing powerno data35.48 TFLOPS
ROPsno data80
TMUsno data224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−4260%
218
+4260%
1440p3−4
−4667%
143
+4667%
4K2−3
−4200%
86
+4200%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.75
1440pno data4.19
4Kno data6.97

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−2225%
186
+2225%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Elden Ring 4−5
−7600%
300−350
+7600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2825%
110−120
+2825%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−2175%
182
+2175%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−3845%
434
+3845%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−7600%
150−160
+7600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1713%
140−150
+1713%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2825%
110−120
+2825%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1888%
159
+1888%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Dota 2 4−5
−4225%
173
+4225%
Elden Ring 4−5
−7600%
300−350
+7600%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1069%
152
+1069%
Fortnite 10−11
−2980%
300−350
+2980%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−3791%
428
+3791%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−4225%
173
+4225%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−3600%
74
+3600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−1032%
210−220
+1032%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1713%
140−150
+1713%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1833%
170−180
+1833%
World of Tanks 35−40
−634%
270−280
+634%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2825%
110−120
+2825%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1638%
139
+1638%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Dota 2 4−5
−3650%
150−160
+3650%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1031%
140−150
+1031%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−3364%
381
+3364%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−1032%
210−220
+1032%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2
−21900%
220−230
+21900%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 148
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1246%
170−180
+1246%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−9200%
90−95
+9200%
World of Tanks 12−14
−4200%
500−550
+4200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 85−90
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−172%
87
+172%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2980%
154
+2980%
Valorant 8−9
−4513%
350−400
+4513%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−938%
166
+938%
Elden Ring 0−1 120−130
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1007%
166
+1007%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−4080%
200−210
+4080%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−6300%
60−65
+6300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1007%
166
+1007%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Dota 2 16−18
−3650%
600−650
+3650%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−10400%
100−110
+10400%
Fortnite 0−1 95−100
Valorant 2−3
−10700%
210−220
+10700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 148
+0%
148
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 265
+0%
265
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 74
+0%
74
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 132
+0%
132
+0%

This is how 9800M GTS SLI and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 4260% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 4667% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 4200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Elden Ring, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 21900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is ahead in 41 test (80%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (20%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.96 78.17
Recency 15 July 2008 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 220 Watt

9800M GTS SLI has 46.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 3888.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTS SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 4467 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.