GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs 9800M GTS SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GTS SLI with GeForce FX 5950 Ultra, including specs and performance data.

9800M GTS SLI
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 150 Watt
1.69
+1200%

9800M GTS SLI outperforms 5950 Ultra by a whopping 1200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9611480
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.910.14
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTNV38
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2008 (17 years ago)23 October 2003 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed600 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million135 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt74 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.800
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz475 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data30.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX109.0a
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1
Valorant 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 7−8 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Valorant 12−14 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Valorant 9−10 0−1

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 0.13
Recency 15 July 2008 23 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 74 Watt

9800M GTS SLI has a 1200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 136.4% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5950 Ultra, on the other hand, has 102.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTS SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 80 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5950 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GTS SLI or GeForce FX 5950 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.