UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs GeForce 9800M GT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9800M GT and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs outperforms 9800M GT by a whopping 336% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1111 | 682 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.05 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
| GPU code name | G92 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 29 July 2008 (16 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 754 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 24.00 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.24 TFLOPS | no data |
| Gigaflops | 360 | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | no data |
| TMUs | 48 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 3−4
−433%
| 16
+433%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−329%
|
30−33
+329%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−329%
|
30−33
+329%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−138%
|
18−20
+138%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−117%
|
13
+117%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−329%
|
30−33
+329%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−44.4%
|
13
+44.4%
|
| Fortnite | 3−4
−733%
|
24−27
+733%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−138%
|
18−20
+138%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−208%
|
35−40
+208%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+50%
|
4
−50%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−133%
|
14−16
+133%
|
| World of Tanks | 21−24
−213%
|
70−75
+213%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−329%
|
30−33
+329%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12
+33.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−138%
|
18−20
+138%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−208%
|
35−40
+208%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
−320%
|
21−24
+320%
|
| World of Tanks | 5−6
−320%
|
21−24
+320%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
−319%
|
130−140
+319%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−80%
|
9−10
+80%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
| Valorant | 6−7
−300%
|
24−27
+300%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−333%
|
65−70
+333%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| Valorant | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Valorant | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 34
+0%
|
34
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6
+0%
|
6
+0%
|
| Valorant | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 31
+0%
|
31
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Valorant | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Valorant | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
This is how 9800M GT and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 433% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the 9800M GT is 50% faster.
- in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 733% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- 9800M GT is ahead in 1 test (2%)
- UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is ahead in 20 tests (43%)
- there's a draw in 26 tests (55%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.99 | 4.32 |
| Recency | 29 July 2008 | 30 March 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has a 336.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GT in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
