Radeon 880M vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Radeon 880M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
880M outperforms 9800M SLI by a whopping 872% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 954 | 334 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.12 | 94.30 |
| Architecture | G9x (2007−2010) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) |
| GPU code name | NB9E-GT2 | Strix Point |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 July 2008 (17 years ago) | 15 July 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2900 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1508 Million | 34,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 139.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 4.454 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 16 |
| TMUs | no data | 48 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 12 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L1 Cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | System Shared |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 3−4
−1100%
| 36
+1100%
|
| 1440p | 2−3
−1000%
| 22
+1000%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−3067%
|
95
+3067%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 1−2
−4100%
|
40−45
+4100%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−1460%
|
75−80
+1460%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−2233%
|
70
+2233%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−980%
|
54
+980%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
−1150%
|
100−105
+1150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−660%
|
75−80
+660%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
−1375%
|
55−60
+1375%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−545%
|
70−75
+545%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−274%
|
140−150
+274%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−1460%
|
75−80
+1460%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−1200%
|
39
+1200%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 35−40
−485%
|
220−230
+485%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−852%
|
200−210
+852%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−880%
|
49
+880%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
−1150%
|
100−105
+1150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−660%
|
75−80
+660%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
−1375%
|
55−60
+1375%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4
−1700%
|
54
+1700%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−545%
|
70−75
+545%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−563%
|
53
+563%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−274%
|
140−150
+274%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−1460%
|
75−80
+1460%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−900%
|
40−45
+900%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−852%
|
200−210
+852%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−820%
|
46
+820%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−660%
|
75−80
+660%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−545%
|
70−75
+545%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−313%
|
33
+313%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−274%
|
140−150
+274%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9
−1150%
|
100−105
+1150%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−660%
|
35−40
+660%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
−871%
|
130−140
+871%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
−795%
|
170−180
+795%
|
| Valorant | 12−14
−1262%
|
170−180
+1262%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1600%
|
16−18
+1600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−1300%
|
40−45
+1300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−820%
|
45−50
+820%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−833%
|
27−30
+833%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−1333%
|
40−45
+1333%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−143%
|
30−35
+143%
|
| Valorant | 9−10
−1078%
|
100−110
+1078%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 4−5
−775%
|
35−40
+775%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−533%
|
18−20
+533%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−533%
|
18−20
+533%
|
1440p
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 22
+0%
|
22
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
This is how 9800M GT SLI and Radeon 880M compete in popular games:
- Radeon 880M is 1100% faster in 1080p
- Radeon 880M is 1000% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Resident Evil 4 Remake, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Radeon 880M is 4100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Radeon 880M performs better in 46 tests (84%)
- there's a draw in 9 tests (16%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.89 | 18.37 |
| Recency | 15 July 2008 | 15 July 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
Radeon 880M has a 872% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 1525% more advanced lithography process, and 767% lower power consumption.
The Radeon 880M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GT SLI in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
