P106-100 vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9800M GT 9800M GTS 9800M GT SLI 9800M GTS SLI 9800M GTX 9800M GTX SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GT SLI with P106-100, including specs and performance data.

9800M GT SLI
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 130 Watt
1.88

P106-100 outperforms 9800M SLI by a whopping 748% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
9800M GT SLI 9800M GT SLI
P106-100 P106-100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking953367
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.1110.21
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNB9E-GT2GP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 July 2008 (17 years ago)19 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921280
Core clock speed500 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1709 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data136.7
Floating-point processing powerno data4.375 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data80
L1 Cacheno data480 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Fortnite 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%
Valorant 35−40
−689%
300−310
+689%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−669%
300−310
+669%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Dota 2 21−24
−710%
170−180
+710%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Fortnite 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Valorant 35−40
−689%
300−310
+689%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Dota 2 21−24
−710%
170−180
+710%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Valorant 35−40
−689%
300−310
+689%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−746%
110−120
+746%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−742%
160−170
+742%
Valorant 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Valorant 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.88 15.95
Recency 15 July 2008 19 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 120 Watt

P106-100 has a 748.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 8.3% lower power consumption.

The P106-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GT SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a notebook graphics card while P106-100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT SLI
GeForce 9800M GT SLI
NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
HD 6850M Radeon HD 6850M
P106-100 P106 100
vs
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
Radeon 520 Radeon 520
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
ATI Mobility 7500C Mobility Radeon 7500C
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
Tesla T10 Processor Tesla T10 Processor
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
Plex 1000 Model IV Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
Vega Frontier Edition Liquid Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
P104-100 P104 100
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
RX Vega XTX Radeon RX Vega XTX
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
RX Vega 64 Nano Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
RX 570X Radeon RX 570X
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
Vega 11 Embedded Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
GTX 460 SE v2 GeForce GTX 460 SE v2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9800M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 361 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GT SLI or P106-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.