GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs 9800M GT SLI

Place in the ranking	889	237
Place by popularity	not in top-100	38
Power efficiency	1.08	21.82
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	NB9E-GT2	GA107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 July 2008 (16 years ago)	11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	2048
Core clock speed	500 MHz	712 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1057 MHz
Number of transistors	1508 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	67.65
Floating-point processing power	no data	4.329 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	40
TMUs	no data	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.6
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.2
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9800M GT SLI 2.04

RTX 3050 Mobile 23.73
+1063%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9800M GT SLI 6271

RTX 3050 Mobile 77234
+1132%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	7−8 −1229%	93 +1229%
1440p	4−5 −1200%	52 +1200%
4K	2−3 −1550%	33 +1550%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −438%	40−45 +438%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1667%	106 +1667%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −1725%	70−75 +1725%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −438%	40−45 +438%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1117%	73 +1117%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1318%	156 +1318%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −5400%	110 +5400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −550%	50−55 +550%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −1725%	70−75 +1725%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −438%	40−45 +438%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −833%	56 +833%
Dota 2	4−5 −3450%	142 +3450%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −900%	130 +900%
Fortnite	10−11 −1110%	120−130 +1110%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1018%	123 +1018%
Grand Theft Auto V	4−5 −3100%	128 +3100%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −3600%	74 +3600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −660%	150−160 +660%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −550%	50−55 +550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −744%	75−80 +744%
World of Tanks	35−40 −546%	250−260 +546%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −1725%	70−75 +1725%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −438%	40−45 +438%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −750%	51 +750%
Dota 2	4−5 −3775%	155 +3775%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −469%	70−75 +469%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −864%	106 +864%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −660%	150−160 +660%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	57
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −1143%	170−180 +1143%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −2100%	21−24 +2100%
World of Tanks	12−14 −1115%	150−160 +1115%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	45−50
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −833%	28 +833%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1033%	65−70 +1033%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −2250%	47 +2250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −600%	35−40 +600%
Valorant	8−9 −688%	60−65 +688%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −256%	57 +256%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −280%	57 +280%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −1100%	70−75 +1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1400%	14−16 +1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −280%	57 +280%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −500%	12 +500%
Dota 2	16−18 −481%	93 +481%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1450%	30−35 +1450%
Fortnite	0−1	27−30
Forza Horizon 5	0−1	24
Valorant	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Forza Horizon 5	97 +0%	97 +0%
Valorant	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Forza Horizon 5	74 +0%	74 +0%
Valorant	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5	69 +0%	69 +0%
Valorant	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	78 +0%	78 +0%
Metro Exodus	69 +0%	69 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	23 +0%	23 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	45 +0%	45 +0%

This is how 9800M GT SLI and RTX 3050 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 Mobile is 1229% faster in 1080p
RTX 3050 Mobile is 1200% faster in 1440p
RTX 3050 Mobile is 1550% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3050 Mobile is 5400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 3050 Mobile is ahead in 46 tests (77%)
there's a draw in 14 tests (23%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.04	23.73
Recency	15 July 2008	11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	75 Watt

RTX 3050 Mobile has a 1063.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 712.5% more advanced lithography process, and 73.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GT SLI in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.