Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce 9800 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking957not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.08no data
Power efficiency1.01no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameG92Ellesmere
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 March 2008 (17 years ago)24 April 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282304 ×2
Core clock speed675 MHz1243 MHz
Number of transistors754 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt250 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate43.20179.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.4321 TFLOPS5.728 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1632 ×2
TMUs64144 ×2
L1 Cacheno data576 KB
L2 Cache64 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm305 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1100 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth70.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVDual Link DVI1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMIVia Adapter+
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 March 2008 24 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 250 Watt

9800 GTX has 78.6% lower power consumption.

Pro Duo Polaris, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800 GTX and Radeon Pro Duo Polaris. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800 GTX is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Duo Polaris is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce 9800 GTX
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 198 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Duo Polaris on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800 GTX or Radeon Pro Duo Polaris, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.