GeForce MX230 vs 9800 GTX

Place in performance ranking	850	611
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.08	1.61
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	G92	N17S-G0
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	28 March 2008 (16 years ago)	20 February 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$299	no data
Current price	$151 (0.5x MSRP)	$1221

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GeForce MX230 has 1913% better value for money than 9800 GTX.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	256
CUDA cores	128	no data
Core clock speed	675 MHz	1519 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1531 MHz
Number of transistors	754 million	1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	140 Watt	10 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	43.2 billion/sec	25.31
Floating-point performance	432.1 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce MX230 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	10.5" (26.7 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1100 MHz	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	70.4 GB/s	48.06 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	HDTVDual Link DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	Via Adapter	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.4
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9800 GTX 1.99

GeForce MX230 4.76
+139%

MX230 outperforms 9800 GTX by 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

9800 GTX 769

GeForce MX230 1839
+139%

MX230 outperforms 9800 GTX by 139% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

9−10

−156%

23
+156%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−167%

8−9
+167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −160%	13 +160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Battlefield 5	7−8 −171%	19 +171%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −180%	14 +180%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −180%	14 +180%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −143%	17 +143%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −163%	21 +163%
Hitman 3	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −150%	24−27 +150%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −157%	18 +157%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −150%	10 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −160%	13 +160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −160%	13 +160%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −140%	12 +140%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −140%	12 +140%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −152%	53 +152%
Hitman 3	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −150%	24−27 +150%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −160%	13 +160%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −150%	15 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −200%	6 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −200%	9 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −250%	7 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −140%	12 +140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −150%	24−27 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −200%	9 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
−160%

12−14

+160%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	2−3
Far Cry 5	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Hitman 3	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
Metro Exodus	0−1	2−3
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	2−3

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−200%

9−10
+200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Hitman 3	0−1	1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	2−3
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	2−3
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−150%

5−6
+150%

This is how 9800 GTX and GeForce MX230 compete in popular games:

GeForce MX230 is 156% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.99	4.76
Recency	28 March 2008	20 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	140 Watt	10 Watt