Quadro T1000 vs GeForce 9800 GTX+

Place in performance ranking	991	302
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.03	8.71
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	G92B	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	16 January 2009 (15 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$229	no data
Current price	$151 (0.7x MSRP)	$920

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro T1000 has 28933% better value for money than 9800 GTX+.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	no data
CUDA cores	128	no data
Core clock speed	738 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	754 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	141 Watt	50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	47.2 billion/sec	no data
Floating-point performance	470.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	10.5" (26.7 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1100 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	70.4 GB/s	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	HDTVDual Link DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	no data
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	no data
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9800 GTX+ 1.31

Quadro T1000 16.86
+1187%

Quadro T1000 outperforms GeForce 9800 GTX+ by 1187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

9800 GTX+ 506

Quadro T1000 6512
+1187%

Quadro T1000 outperforms GeForce 9800 GTX+ by 1187% in Passmark.