ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5830 vs GeForce 9800 GTX+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9100 9200 9300 + nForce 730i 9300 GE 9300 GS 9300 GS Rev. 2 9300 SE 9400 9400 GT 9400 GT PCI 9400 GT Rev. 2 9400 GT Rev. 3 9500 GS 9500 GS Rev. 2 9500 GT 9500 GT Mac Edition 9500 GT Rev. 2 9500 GT Rev. 3 9600 GSO 9600 GSO 512 9600 GS OEM 9600 GT 9600 GT Green Edition 9600 GT Mac Edition 9600 GT Rev. 2 9600 GTX 9800 GT 9800 GT Rebrand 9800 GTX 9800 GTX+ 9800 GX2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5145 5165 5430 5450 5470 5570 5650 5670 Mac Edition 5730 5750 5770 5830 5850 5850 Mac Edition 5870 5870 Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800 GTX+ with Mobility Radeon HD 5830, including specs and performance data.

9800 GTX+
2009, $229
512 MB GDDR3, 141 Watt
1.17

Mobility HD 5830 outperforms 9800 GTX+ by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
9800 GTX+ 9800 GTX+
ATI Mobility HD 5830 Mobility HD 5830

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11011080
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency0.643.97
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG92BBroadway
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 January 2009 (16 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128800
Core clock speed738 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors754 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)141 Watt24 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate47.2320.00
Floating-point processing power0.47 TFLOPS0.8 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs6440
L1 Cacheno data80 KB
L2 Cache64 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth70.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVDual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL2.14.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 47 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.17 1.24
Recency 16 January 2009 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 141 Watt 24 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5830 has a 6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 487.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce 9800 GTX+ and Mobility Radeon HD 5830.

Be aware that GeForce 9800 GTX+ is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 5830 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
GeForce 9800 GTX+
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5830
Mobility Radeon HD 5830
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTX+
vs
ATI HD 5570 Radeon HD 5570
ATI Mobility HD 5830 Mobility Radeon HD 5830
vs
HD 6730M Radeon HD 6730M
9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTX+
vs
9800 GT GeForce 9800 GT
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
RX Vega 64 Nano RX Vega 64 Nano
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
Radeon 540X Radeon 540X
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
E9390 PCIe Radeon E9390 PCIe
GT 120 Mac Edition GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
GT 120 Mac Edition GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
vs
RTX 5060 Ti RTX 5060 Ti
9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTX+
vs
HD 8490 OEM HD 8490 OEM
9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTX+
vs
8800 GT Mac Edition GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTX+
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTX+
vs
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10-8Q
9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTX+
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 137 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800 GTX+ or Mobility Radeon HD 5830, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.