GeForce 9300 SE vs 9650M GT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9650M GT with GeForce 9300 SE, including specs and performance data.

9650M GT
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 23 Watt
0.33
+73.7%

9650M GT outperforms 9300 SE by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13461441
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.09no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG96CG98
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date19 August 2008 (17 years ago)1 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores328
Core clock speed550 MHz540 MHz
Number of transistors314 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Wattno data
Texture fill rate8.8004.320
Floating-point processing power0.0848 TFLOPS0.0208 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolution1920x1200no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9650M GT 0.33
+73.7%
9300 SE 0.19

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9650M GT 137
+69.1%
9300 SE 81

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
God of War 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
God of War 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
God of War 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Valorant 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
God of War 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Valorant 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 0.19
Recency 19 August 2008 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm

9650M GT has a 73.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 9650M GT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9300 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9650M GT is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9300 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
GeForce 9650M GT
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE
GeForce 9300 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 9 votes

Rate GeForce 9650M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce 9300 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9650M GT or GeForce 9300 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.