Quadro T600 Mobile vs GeForce 9650M GS
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9650M GS with Quadro T600 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
T600 Mobile outperforms 9650M GS by a whopping 2517% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1227 | 347 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.68 | 31.90 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | G84 | TU117 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 March 2008 (17 years ago) | 12 April 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1410 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 289 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 29 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 10.00 | 78.96 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.08 TFLOPS | 2.527 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 |
| TMUs | 16 | 56 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 1.1 | 7.5 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 1−2
−5000%
| 51
+5000%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−433%
|
30−35
+433%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−5200%
|
53
+5200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−433%
|
30−35
+433%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−700%
|
60−65
+700%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−362%
|
130−140
+362%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 18−20
−1037%
|
210−220
+1037%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Dota 2 | 12−14
−867%
|
116
+867%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−4800%
|
49
+4800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−433%
|
30−35
+433%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−3500%
|
35−40
+3500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−700%
|
60−65
+700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−767%
|
52
+767%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−362%
|
130−140
+362%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Dota 2 | 12−14
−792%
|
107
+792%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45
+4400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−433%
|
30−35
+433%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−700%
|
60−65
+700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−367%
|
28
+367%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−2486%
|
750−800
+2486%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−2400%
|
75−80
+2400%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 3−4
−4067%
|
120−130
+4067%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−2471%
|
180−190
+2471%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−2000%
|
40−45
+2000%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 1−2
−3800%
|
35−40
+3800%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−107%
|
30−35
+107%
|
| Valorant | 3−4
−3100%
|
95−100
+3100%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−750%
|
16−18
+750%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−750%
|
16−18
+750%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 63
+0%
|
63
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
This is how 9650M GS and T600 Mobile compete in popular games:
- T600 Mobile is 5000% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T600 Mobile is 5200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- T600 Mobile performs better in 28 tests (56%)
- there's a draw in 22 tests (44%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.64 | 16.75 |
| Recency | 13 March 2008 | 12 April 2021 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 29 Watt | 40 Watt |
9650M GS has 37.9% lower power consumption.
T600 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2517.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Quadro T600 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9650M GS in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce 9650M GS is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
