HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) vs GeForce 9650M GS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9650M GS and HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9650M GS
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 29 Watt
0.64
+56.1%

9650M GS outperforms HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12401314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.70no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Gen. 8 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameG84Braswell
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 March 2008 (17 years ago)1 April 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3212
Core clock speed625 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data640 MHz
Number of transistors289 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
+50%
8
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Escape from Tarkov 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Valorant 27−30
+7.7%
24−27
−7.7%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Escape from Tarkov 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 27−30
+7.7%
24−27
−7.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Escape from Tarkov 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 27−30
+7.7%
24−27
−7.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how 9650M GS and HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) compete in popular games:

  • 9650M GS is 50% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the 9650M GS is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • 9650M GS performs better in 23 tests (82%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (18%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 0.41
Recency 13 March 2008 1 April 2016
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm

9650M GS has a 56.1% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 9650M GS is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
GeForce 9650M GS
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9650M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 257 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9650M GS or HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.