GeForce4 4200 Go vs GeForce 9650M GS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9650M GS and GeForce4 4200 Go, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9650M GS
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 29 Watt
0.65
+6400%

9650M GS outperforms GeForce4 4200 Go by a whopping 6400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12481590
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.73no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG84NV28M
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 March 2008 (18 years ago)15 November 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores326
Core clock speed625 MHz2 MHz
Boost clock speedno data200 MHz
Number of transistors289 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)DDR
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9650M GS 0.65
+6400%
GeForce4 4200 Go 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9650M GS 270
+8900%
Samples: 5
GeForce4 4200 Go 3
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Valorant 27−30
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Valorant 27−30
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Valorant 27−30
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 3−4 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the 9650M GS is 150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • 9650M GS performs better in 18 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 0.01
Recency 13 March 2008 15 November 2002
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 150 nm

9650M GS has a 6400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 88% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 9650M GS is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 4200 Go in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9650M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce4 4200 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9650M GS or GeForce4 4200 Go, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.