GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile vs 9650M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9650M GS and GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9650M GS
2008
512 MB GDDR2?, GDDR3, 29 Watt
0.70

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms 9650M GS by a whopping 5214% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1132115
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
ArchitectureG8x (2007−2008)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNB9P-GS1GN20-E5 GA104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 March 2008 (16 years ago)4 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$180 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores325120
CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed625 MHz780 - 1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1290 - 1620 MHz
Number of transistors289 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate10.00287.0
Floating-point performance80 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 9650M GS and GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2?, GDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s320.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.18.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9650M GS 0.70
RTX 3070 Mobile 37.20
+5214%

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms 9650M GS by 5214% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

9650M GS 270
RTX 3070 Mobile 14364
+5220%

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms 9650M GS by 5220% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

9650M GS 1786
RTX 3070 Mobile 77148
+4220%

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms 9650M GS by 4220% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−5600%
114
+5600%
1440p1−2
−7400%
75
+7400%
4K0−148

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 no data
Hitman 3 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 no data
Hitman 3 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Hitman 3 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 no data

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Metro Exodus 0−1 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 91
−5175%
4800−4850
+5175%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−5192%
6350−6400
+5192%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−5209%
4300−4350
+5209%
Forza Horizon 4 189
−5191%
10000−10050
+5191%
Metro Exodus 100−110
−5175%
5750−5800
+5175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−5175%
4800−4850
+5175%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
−5163%
4000−4050
+5163%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−5192%
6350−6400
+5192%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−5209%
4300−4350
+5209%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−5213%
7650−7700
+5213%
Metro Exodus 125
−5180%
6600−6650
+5180%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85
−5194%
4500−4550
+5194%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 68
−5194%
3600−3650
+5194%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−5209%
4300−4350
+5209%
Forza Horizon 4 167
−5199%
8850−8900
+5199%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 82
−5205%
4350−4400
+5205%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−5182%
3750−3800
+5182%
Far Cry New Dawn 123
−5185%
6500−6550
+5185%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
−5183%
2800−2850
+5183%
Forza Horizon 4 140
−5186%
7400−7450
+5186%
Metro Exodus 91
−5175%
4800−4850
+5175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 125
−5180%
6600−6650
+5180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−5183%
2800−2850
+5183%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55
−5173%
2900−2950
+5173%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−5170%
1950−2000
+5170%
Hitman 3 38
−5163%
2000−2050
+5163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 48
−5213%
2550−2600
+5213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
−5213%
3400−3450
+5213%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 33
−5203%
1750−1800
+5203%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−5117%
1200−1250
+5117%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
−5127%
1150−1200
+5127%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−5127%
1150−1200
+5127%
Forza Horizon 4 93
−5169%
4900−4950
+5169%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27
−5085%
1400−1450
+5085%

This is how 9650M GS and RTX 3070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 5600% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 7400% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 37.20
Recency 13 March 2008 4 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 125 Watt

The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9650M GS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
GeForce 9650M GS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9650M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1684 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.