ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200 vs GeForce 9600M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1312not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.29no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameG96CR100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2008 (17 years ago)31 July 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed120 MHz166 MHz
Number of transistors314 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Wattno data
Texture fill rate8.0001
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs166
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s5.312 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2008 31 July 2000
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 180 nm

9600M GT has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 227.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600M GT and All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9600M GT is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
GeForce 9600M GT
ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200
All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 105 votes

Rate GeForce 9600M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600M GT or All-In-Wonder Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.