3D Rage PRO Turbo vs GeForce 9600M GT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)no data
GPU code nameNB9P-GSRage Pro Turbo
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2008 (16 years ago)1 March 1997 (27 years ago)
Current price$287 $50

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32no data
CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed120 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors314 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Wattno data
Texture fill rate8.0000.08
Floating-point performance80 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 9600M GT and 3D Rage PRO Turbo compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIAGP 2x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2, GDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz75 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s600 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)6.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.1
OpenCL1.1None
VulkanN/Ano data
CUDA+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2008 1 March 1997
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 350 nm

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600M GT and 3D Rage PRO Turbo. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9600M GT is a notebook card while 3D Rage PRO Turbo is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
GeForce 9600M GT
ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo
3D Rage PRO Turbo

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 94 votes

Rate GeForce 9600M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.