Radeon HD 6470M vs GeForce 9600 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9600 GT with Radeon HD 6470M, including specs and performance data.

9600 GT
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 96 Watt
1.26
+114%

9600 GT outperforms HD 6470M by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking9991168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG94Seymour XT
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 February 2008 (16 years ago)6 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 $569.99
Current price$141 (0.8x MSRP)$201 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

9600 GT and HD 6470M have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64160
CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed650 MHz700 / 750 MHz
Number of transistors505 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)96 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate20.8 billion/sec5.600
Floating-point performance208 gflops224 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 9600 GT and Radeon HD 6470M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length9" (22.9 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVTwo Dual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL2.14.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9600 GT 1.26
+114%
HD 6470M 0.59

GeForce 9600 GT outperforms Radeon HD 6470M by 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

9600 GT 487
+115%
HD 6470M 227

GeForce 9600 GT outperforms Radeon HD 6470M by 115% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p21−24
+110%
10
−110%
Full HD21−24
+90.9%
11
−90.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 2−3 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 2−3 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
High Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1

This is how 9600 GT and HD 6470M compete in popular games:

  • 9600 GT is 110% faster in 900p
  • 9600 GT is 91% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.26 0.59
Recency 21 February 2008 6 January 2011
Cost $179 $569.99
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm

The GeForce 9600 GT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6470M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9600 GT is a desktop card while Radeon HD 6470M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 9600 GT
AMD Radeon HD 6470M
Radeon HD 6470M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1912 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 135 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6470M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.