Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 vs GeForce 9600 GSO
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9600 GSO and Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
HD 6450 GDDR5 outperforms 9600 GSO by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1198 | 1172 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.09 | no data |
Power efficiency | 0.70 | 2.50 |
Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) |
GPU code name | G92 | Caicos |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 28 April 2008 (17 years ago) | 18 April 2011 (14 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 160 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 750 MHz |
Number of transistors | 754 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 27 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 26.40 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 0.264 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 12 | no data |
TMUs | 48 | no data |
L2 Cache | 48 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
Length | 229 mm | no data |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | no data |
SLI options | 2-way | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 384 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVIHDTV | no data |
Multi monitor support | + | no data |
HDMI | + | - |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | no data |
OpenGL | 2.1 | no data |
OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
Vulkan | N/A | - |
CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 6−7
−16.7%
| 7
+16.7%
|
Full HD | 12−14
−25%
| 15
+25%
|
1200p | 4−5
−25%
| 5
+25%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | 4.17 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Fortnite | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Valorant | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
High
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 29
+0%
|
29
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Fortnite | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Valorant | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Valorant | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
Fortnite | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
High
Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Epic
Fortnite | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how 9600 GSO and HD 6450 GDDR5 compete in popular games:
- HD 6450 GDDR5 is 17% faster in 900p
- HD 6450 GDDR5 is 25% faster in 1080p
- HD 6450 GDDR5 is 25% faster in 1200p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 37 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.73 | 0.84 |
Recency | 28 April 2008 | 18 April 2011 |
Maximum RAM amount | 384 MB | 1 GB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 27 Watt |
HD 6450 GDDR5 has a 15.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 288.9% lower power consumption.
The Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600 GSO in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.