Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB vs GeForce 9600 GSO 512

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9600 GSO 512
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 90 Watt
0.78

6750 GRE 10 GB outperforms 9600 GSO 512 by a whopping 5631% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking120192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data87.17
Power efficiency0.6720.28
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG94Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 October 2008 (17 years ago)17 October 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482304
Core clock speed650 MHz1941 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2450 MHz
Number of transistors505 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt170 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.60352.8
Floating-point processing power0.156 TFLOPS11.29 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs24144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L0 Cacheno data576 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache64 KB3 MB
L3 Cacheno data80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB10 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s320.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDTV1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9600 GSO 512 0.78
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 44.70
+5631%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9600 GSO 512 329
Samples: 95
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 18783
+5609%
Samples: 30

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.78 44.70
Recency 23 October 2008 17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 10 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 170 Watt

9600 GSO 512 has 88.9% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, on the other hand, has a 5630.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600 GSO 512 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 64 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 96 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600 GSO 512 or Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.