GeForce2 Ultra vs GeForce 9600 GSO 512

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and GeForce2 Ultra, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9600 GSO 512
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 90 Watt
0.79
+7800%

9600 GSO 512 outperforms Ultra by a whopping 7800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12101567
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.68no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameG94NV15 A4
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 October 2008 (17 years ago)14 August 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed650 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors505 million25 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.602.000
Floating-point processing power0.156 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs248
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length229 mm183 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz230 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s7.36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDTV1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.11.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9600 GSO 512 0.79
+7800%
GeForce2 Ultra 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9600 GSO 512 329
+5383%
Samples: 95
GeForce2 Ultra 6
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 0.01
Recency 23 October 2008 14 August 2000
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm

9600 GSO 512 has a 7800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 9600 GSO 512 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce2 Ultra in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra
GeForce2 Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 65 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 52 votes

Rate GeForce2 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600 GSO 512 or GeForce2 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.