Arc A530M vs GeForce 9500M GS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9500M GS and Arc A530M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9500M GS
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 20 Watt
0.30

A530M outperforms 9500M GS by a whopping 5927% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1367317
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.2122.52
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG84DG2-256
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2008 (17 years ago)1 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores321536
Core clock speed475 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors289 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate7.600124.8
Floating-point processing power0.0608 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1696
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L2 Cache32 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9500M GS 0.30
Arc A530M 18.08
+5927%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9500M GS 132
Samples: 133
Arc A530M 7993
+5955%
Samples: 38

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4000%
40−45
+4000%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4000%
40−45
+4000%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1875%
75−80
+1875%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−957%
70−75
+957%
Valorant 24−27
−458%
140−150
+458%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1564%
230−240
+1564%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4000%
40−45
+4000%
Dota 2 10−11
−5900%
600−650
+5900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1875%
75−80
+1875%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%
Metro Exodus 0−1 40−45
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−957%
70−75
+957%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Valorant 24−27
−458%
140−150
+458%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4000%
40−45
+4000%
Dota 2 10−11
−5900%
600−650
+5900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1875%
75−80
+1875%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−957%
70−75
+957%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Valorant 24−27
−458%
140−150
+458%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 140−150
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5600%
170−180
+5600%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4700%
45−50
+4700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 30−33

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 45−50

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Valorant 2−3
−5450%
110−120
+5450%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A530M is 5600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A530M performs better in 27 tests (46%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 18.08
Recency 1 February 2008 1 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 65 Watt

9500M GS has 225% lower power consumption.

Arc A530M, on the other hand, has a 5926.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A530M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9500M GS in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
GeForce 9500M GS
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 15 votes

Rate GeForce 9500M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 215 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9500M GS or Arc A530M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.