Radeon Pro 5700 vs GeForce 9500M GE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated238
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.18
Architectureno dataRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameMCP79Mx + NB9MNavi 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date9 January 2008 (17 years ago)4 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores242304
Core clock speedno data1243 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rateno data194.4
Floating-point processing powerno data6.221 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data144
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2, GDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 January 2008 4 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 130 Watt

9500M GE has 420% lower power consumption.

Pro 5700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9500M GE and Radeon Pro 5700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9500M GE is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
GeForce 9500M GE
AMD Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9500M GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 8 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9500M GE or Radeon Pro 5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.