GeForce 9800S vs Radeon Pro 5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking238not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.18no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNavi 10G94
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 August 2020 (5 years ago)15 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230464
Core clock speed1243 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate194.419.20
Floating-point processing power6.221 TFLOPS0.192 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs14432
L2 Cache4 MB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsVGAHDMISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF + HDA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 15 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 75 Watt

Pro 5700 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9800S, on the other hand, has 73.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5700 and GeForce 9800S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9800S is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
GeForce 9800S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 8 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9800S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5700 or GeForce 9800S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.