Arc A370M vs GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated442
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.85
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG96BDG2-128
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 July 2008 (17 years ago)30 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores321024
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors314 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate9.60099.20
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cacheno data1.5 MB
L2 Cache32 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length175 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 35 Watt

Arc A370M has an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 983.3% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 and Arc A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2
GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 189 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 or Arc A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.