ATI Radeon HD 3650 vs GeForce 9500 GS

Place in the ranking	1227	1259
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.89	0.41
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	G96	RV635
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	29 July 2008 (16 years ago)	20 January 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	120
Core clock speed	550 MHz	725 MHz
Number of transistors	314 million	378 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	8.800	5.800
Floating-point processing power	0.088 TFLOPS	0.174 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	4
TMUs	16	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR2	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	256 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	504 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	16.13 GB/s	25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	4.0	4.1
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	1.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9500 GS 0.52
+33.3%

ATI HD 3650 0.39

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9500 GS 201
+34%

ATI HD 3650 150

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.52	0.39
Recency	29 July 2008	20 January 2008
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	256 MB
Chip lithography	65 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	65 Watt

9500 GS has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 62.5% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 3650, on the other hand, has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 9500 GS is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3650 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.