Radeon 780M vs GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated358
Place by popularitynot in top-10037
Power efficiencyno data84.51
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameG96CPhoenix
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 July 2008 (17 years ago)31 January 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32768
Core clock speed500 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2900 MHz
Number of transistors314 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000139.2
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS8.909 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1648
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cache32 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 55 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 780M has an age advantage of 15 years, a 1275% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2 and Radeon 780M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2295 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2 or Radeon 780M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.