GeForce Go 7400 vs 945M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 945M and GeForce Go 7400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 945M
2015
2 GB DDR3, 75 Watt
5.48
+3124%

945M outperforms Go 7400 by a whopping 3124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6101415
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.03no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGM107G72
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 October 2015 (9 years ago)1 February 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6407
Core clock speed928 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1020 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate40.801.800
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs404

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz450 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s7.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.52.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 945M 5.48
+3124%
Go 7400 0.17

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 945M 2108
+3143%
Go 7400 65

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD270−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Elden Ring 14−16 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Valorant 14−16 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Dota 2 18−20 0−1
Elden Ring 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
Fortnite 30−35 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
Valorant 14−16 0−1
World of Tanks 85−90
+780%
10−11
−780%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Dota 2 18−20 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%
Valorant 14−16 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 5−6 0−1
Elden Ring 6−7 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1
World of Tanks 35−40
+3800%
1−2
−3800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Valorant 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Elden Ring 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Fortnite 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Valorant 5−6 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce 945M is 3400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce 945M is ahead in 29 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.48 0.17
Recency 27 October 2015 1 February 2006
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm

GeForce 945M has a 3123.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 945M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GeForce 945M
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
GeForce Go 7400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 11 votes

Rate GeForce 945M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 7 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.