Radeon PRO V710 vs GeForce 940MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 940MX with Radeon PRO V710, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 940MX
2016
4 GB DDR3, GDDR5, 23 Watt
3.61

PRO V710 outperforms 940MX by a whopping 768% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking742185
Place by popularity87not in top-100
Power efficiency11.9615.11
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2016 (9 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5123456
Core clock speed795 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed861 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate27.55432.0
Floating-point processing power0.8817 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs32216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB28 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s504.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 940MX 3.61
PRO V710 31.33
+768%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 940MX 1513
PRO V710 13129
+768%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−733%
150−160
+733%
4K10
−750%
85−90
+750%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−757%
120−130
+757%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Sons of the Forest 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16
−713%
130−140
+713%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−757%
120−130
+757%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Far Cry 5 12
−733%
100−105
+733%
Fortnite 44
−695%
350−400
+695%
Forza Horizon 4 18
−733%
150−160
+733%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
−767%
130−140
+767%
Sons of the Forest 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Valorant 50−55
−684%
400−450
+684%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 13
−746%
110−120
+746%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−757%
120−130
+757%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 58
−762%
500−550
+762%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Dota 2 48
−733%
400−450
+733%
Far Cry 5 12
−733%
100−105
+733%
Fortnite 13
−746%
110−120
+746%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−757%
120−130
+757%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−746%
110−120
+746%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14
−757%
120−130
+757%
Sons of the Forest 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
−733%
100−105
+733%
Valorant 50−55
−684%
400−450
+684%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 11
−764%
95−100
+764%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Dota 2 46
−661%
350−400
+661%
Far Cry 5 11
−764%
95−100
+764%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−733%
100−105
+733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9
−733%
75−80
+733%
Sons of the Forest 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−757%
60−65
+757%
Valorant 50−55
−684%
400−450
+684%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10
−750%
85−90
+750%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−757%
240−250
+757%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−767%
260−270
+767%
Valorant 35−40
−689%
300−310
+689%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Sons of the Forest 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−713%
130−140
+713%
Valorant 18−20
−733%
150−160
+733%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 10−12
−764%
95−100
+764%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Sons of the Forest 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%

This is how GeForce 940MX and PRO V710 compete in popular games:

  • PRO V710 is 733% faster in 1080p
  • PRO V710 is 750% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.61 31.33
Recency 28 June 2016 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 158 Watt

GeForce 940MX has 587% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has a 767.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 600% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO V710 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 940MX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 940MX is a notebook graphics card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GeForce 940MX
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 2395 votes

Rate GeForce 940MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 940MX or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.