Quadro FX 770M vs GeForce 940MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 940MX with Quadro FX 770M, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 940MX
2016
4 GB DDR3, GDDR5, 23 Watt
3.61
+594%

940MX outperforms FX 770M by a whopping 594% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7421261
Place by popularity87not in top-100
Power efficiency11.961.13
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGM107G96
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date28 June 2016 (9 years ago)14 August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$527

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51232
Core clock speed795 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed861 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate27.558.000
Floating-point processing power0.8817 TFLOPS0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs3216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-II
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 940MX 3.61
+594%
FX 770M 0.52

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 940MX 1513
+588%
FX 770M 220

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+800%
2−3
−800%
4K10
+900%
1−2
−900%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data263.50
4Kno data527.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Sons of the Forest 3−4 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16
+700%
2−3
−700%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 12 0−1
Fortnite 44
+633%
6−7
−633%
Forza Horizon 4 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Sons of the Forest 3−4 0−1
Valorant 50−55
+88.9%
27−30
−88.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 58
+241%
16−18
−241%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 48
+336%
10−12
−336%
Far Cry 5 12 0−1
Fortnite 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14
+75%
8−9
−75%
Sons of the Forest 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Valorant 50−55
+88.9%
27−30
−88.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 46
+318%
10−12
−318%
Far Cry 5 11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12
+200%
4−5
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Sons of the Forest 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 50−55
+88.9%
27−30
−88.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10
+900%
1−2
−900%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Valorant 35−40
+660%
5−6
−660%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Sons of the Forest 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Sons of the Forest 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how GeForce 940MX and FX 770M compete in popular games:

  • GeForce 940MX is 800% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce 940MX is 900% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce 940MX is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GeForce 940MX surpassed FX 770M in all 27 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.61 0.52
Recency 28 June 2016 14 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 35 Watt

GeForce 940MX has a 594.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 52.2% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 940MX is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 770M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 940MX is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 770M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GeForce 940MX
NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Quadro FX 770M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 2396 votes

Rate GeForce 940MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 31 votes

Rate Quadro FX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 940MX or Quadro FX 770M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.