Radeon Pro 5300 vs GeForce 9400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9400M with Radeon Pro 5300, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 9400M
2008
12 Watt
0.24

Pro 5300 outperforms 9400M by a whopping 7008% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1444360
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.5415.46
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameC79Navi 14
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 October 2008 (17 years ago)4 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161280
Core clock speed580 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors314 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate4.640132.0
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPS4.224 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 9400M 0.24
Pro 5300 17.06
+7008%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 9400M 101
Samples: 116
Pro 5300 7079
+6909%
Samples: 16

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.24 17.06
Recency 15 October 2008 4 August 2020
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 85 Watt

GeForce 9400M has 608% lower power consumption.

Pro 5300, on the other hand, has a 7008% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5300 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 54 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 101 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M or Radeon Pro 5300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.