ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs GeForce 9400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9400M with Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 9400M
2008
12 Watt
0.24

HD 2600 PRO AGP outperforms 9400M by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14241411
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.540.57
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameC79RV630
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 October 2008 (17 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16120
Core clock speed580 MHz594 MHz
Number of transistors314 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate4.6404.752
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPS0.1426 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared396 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.67 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 9400M 0.24
ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP 0.26
+8.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 9400M 101
Samples: 116
ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP 110
+8.9%
Samples: 12

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.24 0.26
Recency 15 October 2008 28 June 2007
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 35 Watt

GeForce 9400M has an age advantage of 1 year, and 191.7% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP, on the other hand, has a 8.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce 9400M and Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
GeForce 9400M
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 52 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 14 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M or Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.