GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs 9400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1425not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.54no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameC79GK104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 October 2008 (17 years ago)13 September 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16960
Core clock speed580 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1032 MHz
Number of transistors314 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate4.64082.56
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPS1.981 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs880
L1 Cacheno data80 KB
L2 Cacheno data384 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data144.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 October 2008 13 September 2014
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 140 Watt

GeForce 9400M has 1066.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 660 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M and GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
GeForce 9400M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 52 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 51 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M or GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.