GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs Radeon R5 230 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameCaicosGK104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 December 2013 (11 years ago)13 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160960
Core clock speed625 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1032 MHz
Number of transistors370 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate5.00082.56
Floating-point processing power0.2 TFLOPS1.981 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed667 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/s144.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 December 2013 13 September 2014
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 140 Watt

R5 230 OEM has 636.8% lower power consumption.

GTX 660 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 230 OEM and GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
Radeon R5 230 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 24 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 51 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 230 OEM or GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.