Radeon E6760 MXM vs GeForce 9400M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1470not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.01no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameC79Turks
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 October 2008 (17 years ago)2 May 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16480
Core clock speed450 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors314 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60014.40
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs824
L1 Cacheno data48 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data51.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 October 2008 2 May 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 45 Watt

9400M G has 275% lower power consumption.

E6760 MXM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M G and Radeon E6760 MXM. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G
GeForce 9400M G
AMD Radeon E6760 MXM
Radeon E6760 MXM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 6 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon E6760 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M G or Radeon E6760 MXM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.