Radeon Instinct MI200 vs GeForce 9100M G mGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameC79Aldebaran
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 July 2008 (17 years ago)December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores86656
Core clock speed450 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors314 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600707.2
Floating-point processing power0.0176 TFLOPS22.63 TFLOPS
ROPs4no data
TMUs8416
L1 Cacheno data1.6 MB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,638 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 300 Watt

9100M G mGPU has 2400% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI200, on the other hand, has a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel and Radeon Instinct MI200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel
GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel
AMD Radeon Instinct MI200
Radeon Instinct MI200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 11 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel or Radeon Instinct MI200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.