GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile vs 9400M G

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9400M G and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9400M G
2008
12 Watt
0.16

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile outperforms 9400M G by a whopping 28569% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking146189
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.0230.42
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameC79GA103S
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 October 2008 (16 years ago)25 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores167424
Core clock speed450 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1260 MHz
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600292.3
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS18.71 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9400M G 0.16
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 45.87
+28569%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9400M G 67
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 19223
+28591%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1141
1440p-0−189
4K-0−159

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 136
+0%
136
+0%
God of War 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220
+0%
220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
+0%
124
+0%
Far Cry 5 147
+0%
147
+0%
Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
God of War 135
+0%
135
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 179
+0%
179
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
+0%
102
+0%
Dota 2 158
+0%
158
+0%
Far Cry 5 140
+0%
140
+0%
Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 116
+0%
116
+0%
God of War 111
+0%
111
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 146
+0%
146
+0%
Metro Exodus 110
+0%
110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 223
+0%
223
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
+0%
91
+0%
Dota 2 151
+0%
151
+0%
Far Cry 5 132
+0%
132
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
God of War 79
+0%
79
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+0%
118
+0%
Valorant 292
+0%
292
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120
+0%
120
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+0%
101
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry 5 116
+0%
116
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
God of War 65
+0%
65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+0%
86
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+0%
120
+0%
Metro Exodus 48
+0%
48
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%
Valorant 347
+0%
347
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+0%
28
+0%
Dota 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
God of War 46
+0%
46
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 45.87
Recency 15 October 2008 25 January 2022
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 115 Watt

9400M G has 858.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 28568.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G
GeForce 9400M G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 6 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 341 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M G or GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.