UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9400M 9400M (G) / ION (LE) 9400M G 9400M GeForceBoost
VS
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9400M (G) / ION (LE)
2008
12 Watt
0.27

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) outperforms 9400M (G) / ION (LE) by a whopping 341% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

9400M (G) / ION (LE) 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13331027
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.789.43
Architectureno dataGen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameMCP79MXGen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 October 2008 (16 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1624
Core clock speed450 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors282 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9400M (G) / ION (LE) 0.27
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 1.19
+341%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9400M (G) / ION (LE) 607
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 3411
+462%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−700%
8
+700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Valorant 24−27
−30.8%
30−35
+30.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−38.5%
18
+38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 10−11
−20%
12
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Valorant 24−27
−30.8%
30−35
+30.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 10−11
−10%
11
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Valorant 24−27
−30.8%
30−35
+30.8%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 2−3

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 2−3

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3
+0%
3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how 9400M (G) / ION (LE) and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is 700% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is ahead in 25 tests (60%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (40%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.27 1.19
Recency 14 October 2008 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) has a 340.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

9400M (G) / ION (LE) GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
HD 6310 Radeon HD 6310
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5650 Mobility Radeon HD 5650
9400M (G) / ION (LE) GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4330 Mobility Radeon HD 4330
8400M GT GeForce 8400M GT
vs
ATI 9550 Radeon 9550
8400M GT GeForce 8400M GT
vs
Go 7400T GeForce Go 7400T
NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3470 Mobility Radeon HD 3470
9500M GE GeForce 9500M GE
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder 9600 PRO All In-Wonder 9600 PRO
9400M (G) / ION (LE) GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4600 GeForce4 Ti 4600
ATI Mobility HD 3470 Mobility Radeon HD 3470
vs
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile
ATI HD 4200 Radeon HD 4200
vs
HD 7400G Radeon HD 7400G
ATI HD 4200 Radeon HD 4200
vs
NVS 3100M NVS 3100M
8400M GS GeForce 8400M GS
vs
GeForce4 MX 440 GeForce4 MX 440
8400M GS GeForce 8400M GS
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 37 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 122 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.